ACCOUNTING for Everyone

The Longest Running Online Certified Bookkeeping Course

What Considerations Should Be Made for Impairment Testing and Write-Downs in the Mining and Metals Sector: Key Factors to Assess

Overview of Impairment Testing in the Mining and Metals Industry

Impairment testing is a critical financial process in the mining and metals industry, necessitated by the unique nature of the industry’s assets. It determines if the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount, the latter being the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use.

The impairment testing process under accounting standards such as ASC 360, ASC 932-360-35 for US GAAP, and IFRS is triggered when there are indicators of impairment. In mining, these indicators could include a significant drop in commodity prices, adverse legal changes, or a dip in anticipated mine life.

The financial reporting implications require the recognition of an impairment loss, which is recorded on the balance sheet. This loss reflects the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount.

Key Steps in the Process:

  1. Identification: Determine if potential impairment indicators are present.
  2. Testing: Assess recoverable amount versus carrying value.
  3. Calculation: Quantify any impairment loss.
  4. Adjustment: Write down the asset on the balance sheet if impaired.

Compliance with Financial Reporting Standards:

  • Under both US GAAP (ASC) and IFRS, annual tests are required for certain assets.
  • For mining, ASC 932-360-35 guides sector-specific issues.

When an impairment loss is identified, it directly reduces the carrying amount of the asset and impacts the income statement through expense recognition. Consequently, the accuracy and timeliness of these tests are vital to maintain a true and fair view of a company’s financial health in shareholder communications and financial statements. This underscores the importance of a well-managed and methodical approach to impairment testing in the mining and metals sector.

Identification of Potential Impairment Indicators

Impairment testing is a critical exercise to ensure the accuracy of a company’s financial reporting. In the mining and metals industry, recognizing the early signs of asset impairment supports timely, transparent decisions.

External Indicators

Market Conditions: Fluctuations in the market can serve as strong indicators of impairment. A fall in market value or a sudden decrease in prices of metals and minerals due to oversupply or reduced demand can indicate potential impairment. During events such as the coronavirus pandemic, market disruptions were widespread – affecting liquidity and leading to significant variations in both the demand and supply side of commodities markets.

Market Capitalisation: There is often a correlation between an entity’s market capitalisation and its recoverable amount. A significant and prolonged decline in an entity’s market capitalisation below its net asset value may suggest that the assets are impaired.

Internal Indicators

Asset Performance: Internal indicators often hinge on asset performance metrics. Poor performance, cost overruns, or operational inefficiencies may suggest that the asset may not be able to generate future economic benefits to the extent previously expected.

Physical Damage to Assets: Incidences such as equipment failures or mine accidents that cause damage to assets can necessitate impairment testing, especially if such damage impacts the asset’s usefulness or extends its restoration period, thereby affecting future cash flows.

In essence, both external and internal factors play critical roles in identifying potential impairment indicators, and recognizing these early can help mitigate the risks associated with carrying overvalued assets on the balance sheet.

The Impairment Testing Process

The impairment testing process in the mining and metals industry includes determining whether assets may not be recoverable, the estimation of recoverable amounts, and the measurement of any potential impairment losses. Accurately estimating future cash flows and applying suitable discount rates are crucial for this assessment.

Asset Grouping

Assets must be grouped at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows from other assets or groups of assets. In the mining and metals industry, this typically means grouping assets at the level of individual mines or projects. This allows for a more precise recoverability test, ensuring that the estimated future cash flows and any impairment are assessed with reasonable specificity.

Recoverability Test

The recoverability of an asset or asset group is assessed by comparing its carrying amount to its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use. For a mining entity, conducting a cash flow analysis is essential to determine value in use, which involves forecasting future cash flows from the use of the asset and its eventual disposal. The discount rate applied must reflect the current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.

Fair Value Measurement

If the fair value less costs of disposal is used to measure recoverable amount, valuation techniques such as the discounted cash flow model may be applied. Estimating fair value requires detailed understanding of the asset, market participants’ views, and consideration of all available information. Future cash flows should be estimated based on reasonable and supportable assumptions, and discounted at a rate appropriate for the valuation of long-lived assets within the specific industry and market conditions.

Goodwill and Intangible Asset Considerations

In the mining and metals industry, the valuation and subsequent impairment of goodwill and intangible assets are critical procedures that ensure financial statements accurately reflect an entity’s economic status. These assessments entail specific guidelines and methodologies as dictated by financial standards like ASC 350.

Goodwill Impairment Test

The Goodwill Impairment Test under ASC 350 requires a two-step process. Initially, companies must assess whether the fair value of a reporting unit with goodwill falls below its carrying amount. Step one involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, then step two is necessary, which measures the impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying amount.

  • Step 1: Fair value < Carrying amount? Proceed to step 2.
  • Step 2: Measure the impairment loss.

Companies in the mining and metals sector must also evaluate external factors such as market fluctuations, regulatory changes, or shifts in commodity prices, as these can significantly impact the fair value of reporting units and, consequently, goodwill impairment.

Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

Indefinite-lived intangible assets—unlike goodwill, which is tested at the reporting unit level—are assessed individually for impairment. The Impairment Test for Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets requires an annual evaluation, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate potential impairment. The asset is considered impaired if its carrying amount exceeds its fair value, which necessitates a write-down to fair value.

To determine fair value, entities may use:

  • Market approach: Based on comparable market transactions.
  • Income approach: By discounting future cash flows.

Ascertain factors in the mining and metals industry—such as licenses, permits, or rights—can influence the valuation of these assets. Companies must carefully consider the feasibility of projects and longevity of their resources when assessing these intangible assets.

Valuation Techniques and Considerations

When conducting impairment testing and asset write-downs in the mining and metals industry, precise and industry-specific valuation techniques are essential. These techniques must reflect both the current market conditions and the future income potential of the assets.

Income Approach

The Income Approach estimates value based on the income an asset is expected to generate over its useful life. The key method within this approach is Discounted Cash Flows (DCF), where future cash flows are estimated and then discounted back to their present value using a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). For the mining and metals industry, cash flow projections should consider factors such as commodity prices, reserve quantities, production levels, and operational costs.

  • Cash Flow Projections: Estimate future cash flows based explicitly on industry trends and individual asset performance.
  • Discount Rate: Establish a WACC that accurately reflects the cost of capital and the specific risks associated with the mining and metals sector.

Market Approach

The Market Approach looks at comparable transactions and asset values within the industry. This involves analyzing sales or offerings of similar assets under similar circumstances. Valuation through this lens is determined by the price that market participants are willing to pay or receive for such assets.

  • Comparable Transactions: Assessment of recent deals or offers for similar assets within the mining and metals industry.
  • Market Indicators: Monitoring indicators such as stock market trends and metal commodity prices to gauge asset value.

Cost Approach

Under the Cost Approach, value is based on the cost of reproducing or replacing the asset in its current state. This approach can be particularly pertinent when valuing assets that do not yet generate income, such as undeveloped mineral resources or assets under construction.

  • Replacement Cost: Calculation of the expense to replace the current asset with a new one of equivalent utility.
  • Obsolescence Factors: Consideration of physical depreciation, functional or technological obsolescence, and economic factors that may detract from the value of the asset.

Industry-Specific Accounting Considerations

In the mining and metals industry, financial reporting for asset impairment testing and write-downs is governed by specific accounting standards that take into account the unique nature of the industry’s assets. These particular considerations require specialized knowledge of the accounting methods employed within the industry.

Full-Cost and Successful Efforts Methods

Companies in the mining and metals sector often apply two distinct accounting approaches when accounting for their exploration and development expenditures: the Successful Efforts method and the Full-Cost method. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 19 (FAS 19), these methods guide how costs are capitalized and when they should be written off.

  • Successful Efforts Method:
    • Only costs associated with successfully locating new oil and natural gas reserves are capitalized.
    • Costs of drilling dry holes are immediately expensed.
  • Full-Cost Method:
    • This method allows for the capitalization of all exploration and development costs within a designated geographical area, irrespective of success.
    • To comply with Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X and SAB Topic 12.D, companies must perform a Full-Cost Ceiling Test periodically to ensure capitalized costs do not exceed a calculated ceiling limit.

Under both methods, the assessment of impairment may involve complex estimates of future cash flows and the careful evaluation of the adequacy of the capitalized costs remaining within the ceiling limitations.

Proved and Unproved Properties

  • Proved Properties:

    • They consist of developed and undeveloped properties that have extractable reserves.
    • They are evaluated for impairment based on factors outlined in FRC Section 406.01.c, which includes historical experience and current economic conditions.
  • Unproved Properties:

    • These properties are not yet proven to contain commercially viable reserves.
    • Cost of unproved properties are initially excluded from the ceiling test but must eventually be included if not deemed impaired under Industry Guide 7.

While proved properties are typically assessed regularly for impairment, unproved properties can be more challenging to evaluate due to the current exploration stage and lack of definitive extraction plans. It requires companies to make estimations predicting the probability and timing of conversion into proved reserves.

Financial Disclosure and Regulatory Requirements

Mining and metals companies must adhere to specific financial disclosure and regulatory requirements for impairment testing and write-downs of assets. These guidelines ensure transparency and uniformity in how these companies assess and report the value of their assets.

SEC and FASB Guidelines

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mandates the application of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) guidelines, particularly when it comes to the impairment of assets. For instance, FASB ASC Section 360-10-35 provides guidance on when and how an asset should be reviewed for impairment, with a focus on the recoverability test. Mining companies listed in the U.S. must consider these guidelines during their impairment assessments.

  • Impairment Review: Assess recoverability of asset carrying values.
  • Write-downs: Record when carrying value is not recoverable.

IFRS Compliance

Compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), particularly IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, is crucial for companies operating internationally. IAS 36 requires assets to be carried at no more than their recoverable amount, with mandatory annual impairment tests for goodwill and certain intangible assets. The frequency of these tests should not exceed 12 months, as per IAS 36.

  • Recoverable Amount: Higher of fair value less costs of disposal or value in use.
  • Assets must be tested annually for impairment, especially if indicators of impairment exist.

Disclosure Requirements

Disclosure is a vital part of financial reporting, where companies must provide detailed information on their impairment tests and the results. As highlighted by IAS 36.134, disclosures should include the methods and assumptions used to determine the recoverable amount of assets. In business combinations, the purchase price allocation can lead to the recognition of goodwill, which then requires disclosures about impairment testing processes and outcomes.

  • Disclosures in Financial Statements:
    • Methods and assumptions used to calculate recoverable amounts.
    • Information about sensitivity of these assumptions.
    • Details of impairment losses and reversals.

Entities must ensure that their financial statements reflect the appropriate application of these rules, including clear and concise disclosures to support the decisions made regarding impairment of assets. Compliance with both FASB and IFRS, along with adherence to the relevant disclosure requirements, is essential for providing stakeholders with transparent and reliable financial information.

Impact of Impairment Decisions on Stakeholders

Impairment decisions in the mining and metals industry have significant implications for stakeholders, particularly influencing investor relations and guiding strategic business decisions.

Investor Relations

When a company in the mining and metals sector recognizes an impairment, it directly affects the perceived value of its net assets and can lead to a disparity between market capitalization and book value. Investors are concerned with the accuracy of valuations, as impairments may reflect underlying economic conditions affecting the assets’ ability to generate future cash flows. Detailed disclosures of impairment tests provide transparency and can mitigate uncertainties by explaining the assumptions used and the justification for the write-downs. Companies must balance the provision of comprehensive information with the risk of overwhelming investors with complex technical details.

Strategic Business Decisions

The results of impairment tests can prompt strategic business decisions. A significant write-down may indicate that a business needs to reconsider its operations in certain areas, potentially leading to the divestment of underperforming assets or sectors. The establishment of a valuation allowance can be a tool for management to signal to stakeholders their assessment of the recoverability of the assets. Should the market conditions improve, the reversal of impairments can also be seen as an attempt to optimize the balance sheet, influencing future investment and operational strategies. These decisions are often watched closely by the market as they can signal the direction that management is taking the company.

Reversal of Impairments and Subsequent Measurement

In the mining and metals industry, the consideration of impairment loss reversal is critical to accurately reflecting the value of assets. Recoverability assessments are ongoing, with the fair value of assets consistently compared against their carrying value.

An impairment reversal must be recognized if specific criteria are met:

  • The reasons for the initial impairment loss have ceased or reversed.
  • The asset’s recoverable amount has increased due to significant changes in the market.

It’s imperative to note that the revised carrying value after an impairment reversal can not exceed what the net book value would have been, had no impairment loss been recognized.

Entities should consider the following aspects during the subsequent measurement:

Recoverable AmountThe higher of an asset’s fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use must be considered.
Impairment LossAn initial write-down to the recoverable amount reflects when assets are carried at more than their recoverable amount.
Net Book ValueThe carrying amount of the asset after accounting for depreciation and amortization.

Subsequent recoverability tests must revise assumptions for future cash flows, discount rates, and operational timelines to ensure accurate reflection of the asset’s value. If there is a subsequent increase in recoverable amount, a previously recognized impairment loss may be reversed up to the newly assessed recoverable amount, not to exceed the net book value that would have been determined if no impairment had occurred. Impairment reversals must be recorded in the income statement except for revalued assets taken directly to equity.

Practical Challenges and Best Practices

When conducting impairment testing in the mining and metals industry, certain challenges are inherent due to the sector’s specific characteristics. Successful navigation through these requires a strategic approach to accurately assess the value and potential impairments of assets.

Estimating Useful Life and Discount Rates

Determining the useful life of assets in the mining industry poses challenges due to the finite nature of mineral reserves and the potential for technological advancements to extend or reduce this period. The discount rate must reflect the current market conditions and the specific risks facing the entity. A robust methodology should be applied to ensure that the rate used is appropriate for each distinct asset, and may vary for assets such as crude oil, which are subject to higher price volatility.

Managing Volatile Commodity Prices

Commodity prices, particularly for metallic and energy commodities like crude oil, significantly impact the valuation of assets. Companies should continuously monitor market prices and use forward-looking price curves to estimate future cash flows. Here, the impairment testing is materially sensitive to price assumptions, requiring companies to have a disciplined approach in place for dealing with price fluctuations and to clearly document their pricing models.

Dealing with Complex International Operations

The presence of subsidiaries operating in different jurisdictions adds a layer of complexity to impairment assessments. Companies must consider the operational, legal, and tax environments that could affect the cash flows of international operations. Currency exchange rates and regulatory changes can also impact the valuation of individual assets and potentially lead to asset writedowns. Best practices suggest testing assets on a distinct asset or cash-generating unit basis to isolate the effects of such external factors.

Advanced Topics and Emerging Trends

This section presents an in-depth analysis of how emerging technology influences asset valuation and how environmental regulations may lead to value impairment in the mining and metals industry.

Technological Impact on Asset Valuation

In the landscape of the mining and metals industry, innovative technologies are significantly altering the valuation of assets. For example, Automated and Remote Operations Technology is enhancing efficiency and is expected to extend the life of mining assets which may result in a shift in impairment testing and eventual write-downs. The integration of Internet of Things (IoT) devices offers real-time data analytics, leading to more accurate cash flow forecasts which are essential in impairment testing under IAS 36. These technologies necessitate a reevaluation of useful life estimates and residual values as they evolve.

Environmental Regulations and Value Impairment

Stricter environmental regulations are reshaping the mining and metals sector with a direct impact on asset impairment charges. Assets may face an increased risk of write-downs due to regulatory changes that affect market value and expected future cash flows. Companies must consider the Cost of Compliance with new rules, which could make some assets less viable, leading to potential impairment. Carbon Pricing Mechanisms and Emission Standards are examples where regulation can significantly alter operational costs and, consequently, asset valuations. The industry must closely monitor such regulations to anticipate their effect on impairment charges.

Case Studies and Key Rulings

In the mining and metals industry, impairment testing and write-downs of assets are underpinned by historical precedents and recent cases, often guided by accounting standards such as ASC Topic 360 and its subtopics, as well as by regulatory frameworks like Regulation S-X.

Historical Precedents

Historically, the application of ASC 360, particularly ASC 360-10-35, has set a precedent for how companies should approach impairment of long-lived assets. Entities must review assets for impairment when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If such an event has occurred, the entities perform a recoverability test; if the carrying amount exceeds the sum of undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and fair value. Regulation S-X has implications on how these impairments are reported in financial statements, requiring clear documentation and justification for the impairments.

  • ASC 360-10-35 P1: Defines when and how an impairment test should be done.
  • ASC 360-10-35 P2: Details the steps to determine whether an asset is impaired.
  • ASC 360-10-35 P3: Discusses the measurement of an impairment loss.

Critically, historical cases have solidified these steps as industry norms for ensuring accurate representation of asset values.

Recent Impairment Cases

Recent impairment cases in the mining and metals sector demonstrate the evolving nature of asset management and the importance of adhering to the relevant accounting standards. Companies have had to make significant write-downs after reevaluating their asset’s future cash flows and market conditions. These write-downs often reflect changes in global commodity prices, cost increases, overestimation of recoverable reserves, or reductions in the economic lifespan of mines.

For example, in a recent high-profile case, a major mining entity had to write down billions from its asset value, primarily due to a decrease in forecasted commodity prices which was identified as a triggering event under ASC 360-10-35. The impairment loss was then measured, and the decision documented in compliance with Regulation S-X. The case brought to light the critical importance of regularly reassessing asset valuations against market conditions and highlighted:

  • The need to carefully establish and document the impairment triggering events.
  • The importance of rigorous testing and validation of cash flow projections and assumptions against market benchmarks.

These cases emphasize how regulatory and accounting guidelines shape the financial landscape of the mining and metals industry.

Preparing for a Potential Audit

When companies in the mining and metals industry conduct impairment testing and asset write-downs, preparing for a potential audit is critical. Auditors will meticulously review the financial reporting and balance sheet entries related to asset valuations.


  • Fair Value Assessments: Companies must ensure that impairments are recorded accurately, based on reliable fair value measurements.
  • Assessment of Impairment Indicators: They should identify and document any possible indicators of impairment, as these will be scrutinized during an audit.


  • Companies must disclose the methods and assumptions used in their impairment tests. This transparency allows auditors to verify the appropriateness of the procedures and estimates.

Reporting Unit

  • Goodwill and Impairment Testing: Determine the reporting unit to which goodwill and other intangible assets belong. The impairment testing should align with these units for consistency and accuracy.

Checklist for Audit Preparation:

Checklist ItemDescription
Documented Impairment IndicatorsEvidence of external and internal factors leading to impairment.
Detailed Fair Value CalculationsJustification of the valuation techniques and inputs used.
Reporting Unit AlignmentAlignment of assets and goodwill with the correct reporting units.
Disclosure CompletenessComprehensive disclosures of valuation methods and assumptions.
Reconciliation with Financial StatementsEnsure that balance sheet accounts reflect the impairments accurately.

Companies should maintain organized records throughout the year to streamline the audit process. This includes keeping detailed minutes of meetings where impairment was discussed, any external valuation reports, and correspondence with valuation experts. The ultimate goal is to demonstrate the robustness of the impairment testing process through clear and accurate documentation.

Recognizing and Responding to Trigger Events

In the mining and metals industry, recognizing trigger events that could lead to impairment is vital. These events may include a significant drop in commodity prices, changes in geopolitical factors that affect supply chains, or significant environmental disasters.

Qualitative Factors
Careful consideration should be given to qualitative factors that might indicate impairment. These factors include, but are not limited to:

  • Market capitalization falling significantly below net asset value
  • Sustained decline in stock prices or market demand for metals or minerals
  • Legal changes that alter operational framework
  • Outdated or inefficient technology that hampers extraction or production

Triggering Events on a Field-by-field Basis
Assessments must be conducted on a field-by-field basis, keeping in mind that different fields may face unique challenges and trigger events. For instance:

  • Field A might be impacted by new regulatory changes that restrict mining operations.
  • Field B’s assessment could be due to a drastic decrease in resources, substantially reducing expected yield.
  • Field C might experience a geopolitical event that halts production indefinitely.

Internal Indicators
Companies should monitor internal indicators rigorously, such as significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results or evidence of obsolescence of assets. Efficient data gathering and monitoring systems are essential for timely detection and management of the aforementioned indicators.

Upon recognizing any triggering events, companies must respond promptly with a systematic review and, if applicable, perform a formal impairment test to measure and, if necessary, report any asset write-downs in compliance with applicable accounting standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

Impairment testing and write-downs of assets ensure that a company’s financial statements reflect the real value of its assets. In the context of the mining and metals industry, it is crucial to maintain accuracy since the sector often faces volatile commodity prices and changing economic conditions.

How is asset impairment determined in accordance with IAS 36?

IAS 36 mandates that an asset’s recoverable amount needs to be estimated whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired. In mining, this might be due to a significant drop in commodity prices. If this recoverable amount is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss should be recognized.

What journal entries are required when recording an impairment loss?

When an asset is impaired, the impairment loss is recorded in the financial statements by debiting the profit and loss account and crediting the carrying amount of the asset. This reduces the carrying value of the asset on the balance sheet to its recoverable amount.

What internal indicators suggest the need for asset impairment testing in the mining sector?

Indicators for potential impairment in the mining sector include significant declines in market value, substantial changes in the way the asset is used, increased costs, and declining resources or reserves, which may affect the economic benefits of the assets.

What are the critical factors influencing impairment assessments of mining and metals assets?

Key factors influencing impairment assessments include the commodity prices, the ore grade, the cost of production, new regulations, and changes in market demand for the metal or mineral concerned. These factors can significantly affect the estimated future cash flows from the assets.

Under which scenarios must a mining company recognize an impairment loss for its assets?

A mining company must recognize an impairment loss when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher of fair value minus costs of disposal and value in use. This situation often arises due to adverse changes in the market or the mining environment.

Which accounting treatments are applicable for asset impairments in the metals industry?

In metals, the applicable accounting treatment for impairments involves adjusting the carrying amount of tangible and intangible assets to their recoverable amounts and recording any impairment losses as an expense, which affects the profit and loss statement.

Get More From Accounting for Everyone With Weekly Updates


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.